Kamm. Steadfast.

In light of this, this, this, and this, you should read Oliver Kamm’s tireless defense of his position on Iraq. Although I can’t say that I agree with everything Kamm writes, or even most of what Kamm writes, he does make a compelling case here that deserves to be heard over the deafening roar of second-guessing the decision to invade.

Explore posts in the same categories: Iraq

One Comment on “Kamm. Steadfast.”

  1. HW Says:

    Kamm’s argument is a good one, but like his opponents he is arguing in the wrong direction. Until we master the art of skipping through black holes into alternate universes and hopping the next time warp, the time line only goes one way. And right now only a delusional observer would deny that the coalition is losing in Iraq, by any measure and in reference to any set of war aims. The time of reckoning is at hand, for us if not for the Bush administration, which may be the most frustrating aspect of this whole policy debate: the person most able to direct America’s Iraq policy is the person least interested in thinking about it. Peter Beinart has more: http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20061030&s=trb103006

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: